A System for text analysis
When you are analysing text you
have to do two things. First, you need to recognise what is there, then,
using your knowledge of language, you need to decide why it is there. It
is not enough to list how many complex sentences there are, calculate the ratio
of passive to active structures and mention a preference for pre- over
post-modification. Nor is it enough to say that a text ‘moves' you,
‘clarifies matters well' , 'really grabs your attention' or ‘sounds
sarcastic'. You are allowed to have personal response and it doesn't do any harm
to be able to recognise features, but the only way to do a fair and thorough
analysis of any text is to use a system.
The exact details of your own system should be evolved by you, and you ought to keep it as flexible as possible. It will have to allow for the major differences between spoken and written language. This system can be used both with written and prepared spoken (as in a speech or rehearsed interview.)
Audience (Who was this written for?) Is the target audience sophisticated well-educated young or old? specialist or not?
Purpose (What was the writer's intention?) Was (s)he attempting to entertain? persuade? inform? instruct? do several things at once?
did the writer sound?) Did (s)he seem to you to have a personality? If not, why
not? If so, of what type? Did she seem to be factual or emotional? consistent?
direct or subtle?
Audience (Educational level/degree of sophistication)
Words Latinate or Anglo-Saxon? any foreign words? any idioms and clichés?
simple or complex? (look at clauses) very long or short sentences? word
order usual? (e.g. subject-verb)
Words very simple vocabulary for children? slang associated with a certain period and thus age group? archaisms? formal or colloquial?
simple co-ordinators like 'and' exclamations for teenagers elegant
variation (i.e. numerous subordinate clauses)
Words specialist/technical terms insider language
layout including charts. flow-charts, diagrams, tables etc. unusual
Words humour through puns phonological effects 'bad' language nonsense words
alliteration and assonance form not the same as function (effect
is ironic) variety of structure to maintain interest
is by far the hardest category to talk about. Look out for unusual words and
structures which amuse or interest you. Sequencing - the order in which things
are written - is also important.)
Words emotive and extreme language (look at adjectives and adverbs carefully) ‘loaded' words (look at verbs)
Structures repetition for effect rhetorical questions question and answer exclamatory sentences two-part, balanced sentences
Words precise labels (nouns) prepositions (specifying inter-relations.) factual adjectives adverbials of time and place
sequencing declarative sentences lists tables
Words prepositions 'a'/'the' distinction important adverbs of manner, time and place
imperative mood verbs sequencing format: sub-sections
Personality (Remember that the writer may be speaking as a persona and not as herself try not to confuse the two.)
Words hyperbolic (exaggerated) or understated; assertive e.g. 'I think' as opposed to 'it seems to me' ; anxious - question tags muddled or clear (look at nouns); attitude to others (look at nouns) ; attitude to others (look at adjectives); colloquial and chatty or formal? original - unusual collocations ; unconventional - taboo words
active (involved) or passive (objective)? first person or third person?
personal? (lots of ‘I’s and 'me's)
Is the tone sophisticated or simple?
Words long and Latinate? jokes, puns and plays on words? jargon? specialist language or simple?
short statements or long, complex sentences? simple co-ordination or lots
'stream of consciousness' - where the writer shares their thought process with
the reader? any asides? - jokey or informational?
Is the tone factual or emotional?
Words nouns mainly concrete or abstract? adjectives and adverbs informing or directing? articles or possessive pronouns? ('the country' or 'my country'?)
declaratives or exclamations/questions and answers?
lists for precision? detailed post-modification? long, reflective passages or snappy sentences? layout - numbered and
ordered or anarchic?
the tone consistent?
Does the style remain the same
throughout or are there shifts? If there are, can you suggest why?
Does a simple, emotional opening attract your sympathy before the complexities are introduced?
Or does an attempt to be factual disappear as the writer's bias comes through?
Are changes deliberate or a failure?
you have collected your evidence by looking closely at words and structures, you
will be in a position to write an informed, fair appraisal of the text. Plan
what you are going to say: decide what your overall opinion of the text is, as
well as dealing with how effectively it addresses its chosen audience, whether
it achieves its purpose and whether you feel it adopts a suitable and
appropriate tone. When you have completed your analysis, look at what you have
Is it well-ordered and thus
Is it an expression of your
personality - if you want it to be?
Is it thorough or vague?
Is it linguistic - i.e. have
you used the appropriate specialist terms?